Dani Linder

Dani Linder

Image used with permission, all rights remain with the author. Photograph credit to University of Queensland.

Bundjalung/Kungarakany

Larkin, D., and Crowe, J.,(2021). Roach v Electoral Commissioner (2007) HCA 43. In Heather Douglas, H., and Watson, N.,(Ed) Indigenous legal judgments: bringing Indigenous voices into judicial decision making. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. 245-259.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003174349

Larkin, D. (2018). Royal visit’s model for Aboriginal sovereignty. Eureka Street, 28(21), 43–45.

Larkin, D. (2018). Aboriginal participation before recognition. Eureka Street, 28(13), 23–25. Accessed Jan 12, 2023.
https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.728169274340257

Larkin, D., Hobbs, H., Lino, D., and Maguire, A. (2022). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, law reform and the return of the states. University of Queensland Law Journal 41 (1) 35-58.
https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i1.6353

Larkin, D., & Galloway, K. (2021). Constitutionally entrenched Voice to Parliament: Representation and good governance. Alternative Law Journal, 46(3), 193–198.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211019807

Larkin, D., & Rigney, S. (2021). State and territory legislative vulnerabilities and why an Indigenous Voice must be constitutionally enshrined. Alternative Law Journal, 46(3), 205–211.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X211032734

Larkin, D., and Galloway, (2018) Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian Public Law Pluralism, Bond Law Review 30 (2) Larkin, Dani, and Kate Galloway. 2018. “Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian Public Law Pluralism.” Bond Law Review 30 (2).
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6796.

How Do the Major Parties Rates on First Nations Voice to Parliment: We ask 5 experts, The Conversation, 18 May, 2022. Accessed Jan 11, 2023.
https://theconversation.com/how-do-the-major-parties-rate-on-the-first-nations-voice-to-parliament-we-asked-5-experts-181162